I have been to museums all over the world (see my main
blog for such experiences) and have rarely encountered any that I did not
appreciate and enjoy on some level. As a generally optimistic individual, I
generally try to see the best in the situations I experience, including my
museum experiences. However, this week’s readings have encouraged me to think
critically and consider asking more of museums.
I was
grateful for the balance that came with reading both “Local History,’ Old
Things to Look At,’ and a Sculptor's Vision: Exploring Local Museums through Curriculum
Theory” by Elizabeth Vallance and “The Museum, a Temple or the Forum” by Duncan
F. Cameron. Though I should have known via the absence of an oxford comma in
the title Cameron’s chapter that I would enjoy the piece on the local more,
both chapters brought valuable insights to my thinking about museums.
The
chapter by Cameron focuses mainly on public museums. It calls all that would
dare call themselves museums to a high standard of social and political
responsibility. While the level of objectivity demanded in this chapter may be
unattainable, it is worth looking into reform in the area of presenting
multiple sides of stories and making sure that not only the dominant narrative
is shared with the public. However, I am not sure I completely agreed with the
strict defining and isolating of the museum upon which Cameron insists. I
believe that there needs to be space for creativity and differences within the
realm of museums. Having visited temples, I would vouch for their educational
properties. A historical temple combined with aspects of a museum can be a
great experience in learning what a certain group of people at a certain time
valued.
The
other chapter focused more on privately owned museums. While “The Museum, a
Temple or the Forum” puts down the practice of subjectively deciding which
items were real and valuable, the chapter by Vallance acknowledges the value of
individuals being able to display collections that show more about themselves,
such as The Continental Sculpture Hall. It allows a more fluid definition of
museums. While still striving for a complete telling of histories, Vallance
recognizes and celebrates the things that local museums do well.
The
City Museum of St. Louis is referred a couple of times in “Local History, ‘Old
Things to Look At,’ and a Sculptor’s Vision.” This summer, I visited this
museum with several friends. While Cameron would likely argue the title of
museum for this facility due to its playful nature as well as its being created
primarily from one individual, I found it an incredibly valuable space that
stretched my schema of museum in a positive way. Vallance comments positively
on the quirkiness of the City Museum. While there is little text found in the museum,
it is a testament to an incredible story of a man with a dream and a warehouse
and encourages visitors of all ages to never stop playing an exploring,
activities that create dynamic, lifelong learners.
(I snapped this photo looking up in the City Museum in St. Louis)
(While exploring in the City Museum, I found myself in the giant teeth of a rock monster in an extended, multi-level indoor cave system!)
Over
all, these chapters encouraged me to enter the museums we will experience this
semester with a critical perspective. I hope to observe with an open mind, acknowledging
strengths with enjoyment and weaknesses graciously.


test comment
ReplyDeleteHi, Jenna - this was a great pleasure to read, and your photos demonstrate that you have a personal connection to the subject matter.
ReplyDeleteI look forward to reading more of your work.
4.5 out of 3
Ms. Jean